No. 18-6612
James Pinkney v. United States
IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924 18-usc-924e2bi armed-career-criminal-act categorical-approach force illinois-robbery-statute statutory-interpretation stokeling-v-united-states use-of-force violent-felony
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Illinois robbery statute categorically requires the use of force called for by this Court so as to qualify as a 'violent felony' under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. §924(e)(2)(B)(i)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Illinois robbery statute categorically requires the use of force called for by this Court so as to qualify as a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, (ACCA) 18 U.S.C. §924(e)(2)(B)(i)? i
Docket Entries
2019-04-19
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2019-03-18
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Stokeling v. United States, 586 U. S. ___ (2019).
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-08
Memorandum of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-01-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 8, 2019.
2019-01-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 9, 2019 to February 8, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-12-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 9, 2019.
2018-12-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 10, 2018 to January 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 10, 2018)
Attorneys
James Pinkney
Nicholas G. Grapsas — Nicholas G. Grapsas, Ltd., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent