How can a constitutional challenge be frivolous?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4 (1) How Can a CONSTITUTIONAL challenge be frivolous? (2)Did the Appellate Court for the Fifth Circuit Intentionally violate their oath of office to uphold the Constitution, by their verbal threats without hearing the merits of the Constitutional challenges? (3) Is their silence on the legalities of the ConstitutionaL challenge equate to fraud, when there is a legal duty to speak, or intentionally mislead from such a Constitutional challenge? (4) Is'nt the United States Constitution the SUPREME Law of the Land? if so wouldnt it be binding upon all Courts of the land as stated by this Supreme Court as stated in Valentine v. United states,299 US 5,81 L.Ed 5,5 S.ct 100? (5)Can this Supreme Court condone this shocking conduct that not ° only violates its oath but Article I,§9,c1l2 and Article VI,§ 2? (6)Why did both the District Court and the Appellate Court Unconstitutionalls suspend and interfere with this Petitioner's Constitutionally protected rights? 7 (7)Did the aforementioned Courts intentionally impede,inhibit or attempt to impede Constitutionally protected Freedom of speech to grievance Petitioner's government? : (8) Did'nt the Framers of the Constitution take steps to prevent future abuse or practices such as this that hinders the peoples Constitutionally protected right as stated herein? (9)Why was neither challenge (1) the Unconstitionality of a statute (18 USC § 1470); and (2) Unconstitutional interpretation of a statute by a fedetral judge ever addressed, instead of making excuses of rules? ‘ (10)Does'nt the First Amendment guarantee the right to be heard? (11)Did'nt the Supreme Court clearly state,there is no higher duty to maintaine the writ of habeas corpus unimpaired in Fay v. Noia, 372 US 391,9 L.Ed 2d 837; Johnson v. Avery,393 US 483,21 L.ed 2d 718? (12) Is'nt the silence of a Constitutional challenge fraud,when there is a legal duty to speak? : (13) Didnt the Supreme Court state: " The United States Constitution : is binding upon all courts state and national, and that ALL Courts must take juducial notice and be governed by? (14) How is a challenge on the Constitutionality frivolous is this . Supreme Court clerk granted permission to refile? ~