William Foley Miller v. Florida
Who did not use any federal case's or federal codes, did not preserve these issues for review that creates an unexhausted and procedurally defaulted claim in a federal habeas corpus §2254, does the state appellate attorney have to have a specific allotment to make a separate federal argument in the appellate brief?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED L, Noes A State Appellate Who Did Not Use Any Federal Case's Or Faderal Codes Di Not Preserve Thase -Lesves For ReveiW Thzt Creats A Un) exhausted And Prace durally Defaulted Claim Ln A Fadefa | Habeas Corpus $2284 Does The State Appellate Attorney, Have lo Had A SPeciFiae Aloe d To Make A Seperate Fader! ArauomMent In The Appellate Brie F 2 ll, Does The State Trial ComMent . Fund«wMental Error When It Denies AK DeFendatis Motion For Mistrial When A State Witness TL MProPerlY CoM Ments On The Deka ndant Request For Public DeFender 2