No. 18-6633
Keith Fremin v. Robert C. Tanner, Warden
IFP
Tags: castration civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process good-time guilty-plea ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel judicial-district plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing
Latest Conference:
2019-01-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the 22nd Judicial District Court failed to uphold the plea agreement in exchange for a guilty plea?
Whether Counsel for the Petitioner was ineffective, by allowing the Petitioner to enter a guilty plea and have him castrated in exchange for good time, knowing this promise could not be fulfilled?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 22 Judicial District Court failed to uphold the plea agreement in exchange
Docket Entries
2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2017-09-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 10, 2018)
Attorneys
Keith Fremin
Keith Fremin — Petitioner