Harold E. Grist, Jr. v. Terema Carlin, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Privacy
Whether the Petitioner had a constitutional right to confront his accusers at trial and impeach them before a jury to challenge their credibility and truthfulness?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED QUESTION ONE Whether the Petitioner had a constitutional right to . confront his accusers at trial and impeach them before a jury to challenge their credibility and truthfulness ? QUESTION TWO : Whether. Petitioner was denied effective assistance of ; in all state court proceedings when the district court inferred such ? . QUESTION THREE Whether juror misconduct and introducing extrinsic evidence in jury deliberations violated Petitioner's rights ? QUESTION FOUR Whether Petitioner was forced to incriminate himself after his constitutional right ? : QUESTION FIVE Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a a Certificate of Appealability in direct conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court's mandates governing such ? PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. . . Page 3