Michael Carlton Lowe v. Tom Roy, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Corrections
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Jurisdiction
Did the district court abuse its discretion by answering a federal question on petitioner's liberty interest in a state court?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Did the district court abuse its discretion by answering a federal question on petitioner’s liberty interest in a state court? 4 II. Did the district court violate due process by suspending habeas corpus . without public safety requiring it’s suspension in the case of rebellion? . III. Did the district court err by denying that habeas corpus should lie where a petitioner—after conviction, challenges the district court’s jurisdiction; whether the sentence was authorized by law; or whether petitioner’s : . fundamental right to due process has been violated? : IV. Did the district court err by denying a hearing, where it appears from the ; petition and record that the facts established entitle him to discharge? ~ V. Did the district court err by denying petitioner’s writ setting forth sufficient facts to establish a prima facie case for his discharge? : ‘Lowe ; . 2 z] ¢ .