No. 18-6653

Rolando Calderin v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2018-11-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-court-error appellate-review constitutional-rights constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process inculpatory-statements miranda-rights right-to-counsel self-incrimination suppression-of-evidence trial-court-error
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Illinois Trial Court and Appellate Court erred when it failed to suppress Petitioner's inculpatory statements that were obtained after petitioner made several unequivocal and unambiguous requests for a lawyer in violation of Petitioner's Constitutional Right to Counsel, and whether Illinois Supreme Court erred by refusing to review petitioners violations in this case

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 7 Whether Illinois Trial Court and Appellate Court erred when it failed to suppress” . Petitioner’s inculpatory statements that were obtained after netitioner thade several , unequivocal and unambiguous requests for a lawyer in Violation of Petitioner’s Constitutional ; Right to Counsel. And whether illinois Supreme Court erred by refusing to review petitioners violations in this case. . : . : LIST ALL PARTIES oe [X] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-27
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2018-08-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 10, 2018)

Attorneys

Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Rolando Calderin
Rolando Calderin — Petitioner
Rolando Calderin — Petitioner