No. 18-6655
Andrew John Miller v. Duncan MacLaren, Warden
IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence preliminary-examination right-to-counsel sixth-amendment witness-testimony
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-01-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the admission of a Preliminary Examination transcript violated the Petitioner-Appellant's 6th Amendment right to confront the witness
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW IL Whether review is warranted because the convictions must be reversed and this matter remanded for a new trial where the admission of a Preliminary Examination transcript violated his 6™ Amendment right to confront that witness, contrary to clearly established law? Answers: “Yes” Respondent-Appellee Answers: “No” i
Docket Entries
2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2018)
Attorneys
Andrew Miller
Anastase Markou — Levine & Levine, Petitioner
Anastase Markou — Levine & Levine, Petitioner