Whether petitioner was denied of his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to a fair trial, due process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED OF HIS SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO A FAIR TRIAL, DUE PROCESS, WHERE BOTH GREGORY AND BRENDA RUSHLOW’S IN-COURT IDENTIFICATION OF THE DEFENDANT SHOULD HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSED, AS THEY WERE BASED ON UNNECESSARILY SUGGESTIVE PHOTOGRAPHIC LINE-UPS AND THE IDENTIFICATIONS WERE INHERENTLY UNRELIABLE? . Il. WHETHER PETITIONER'S SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING AND TO DUE PROCESS WERE VIOLATED WHERE THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION AND . . MISCONSTRUED A MOTION_.TO | ARGUMENTS TO HIS REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF. . APPEALABILITY AND TREATED NINE OF HIS TEN CLAIMS AS ABANDONED CLAIMS AND REFUSED TO ENTERTAIN HIS RULE 60(b) MOTION ADDRESSING THE COURTS RULING THAT HE HAD ABANDONMENT HIS CLAIMS? i ova a