Whether the Appellate Court erred in rejecting the Petitioner's claim of provocation instruction due to the Petitioner's testimony that he acted out of fear of the victim's prior violent acts

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED |. The Appellate Couct tadijag the Pehtinnen a bar ce ae =e led | To 4 Secinos Provocation lastcvetion tio . Becanse He Tstified that He Anted cust —— Opoctis Precedent a 2.This Case Creseats aa bnpactaat Goeschion: Poosecution LS Entitled to as coond Ded (ée, Muxdoec , uc lastase+ LoNs k ase On Serieus {Wenvas otto bemmin ‘CO +h Sobstan ial 3. The Aooel\ or 0 aa | + A ' cious Yrovoration Foetbel te he lnenslent defense of ~ TST ORPARTIES WA parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. . [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all