Considering this circuit split that has developed, does the Fourth Circuit's denial of Zater's §2244 application, which would have been granted in other circuits under the divergent gatekeeping protocols, create exceptional circumstances warranting an exercise of this Court's supervisory powers, since Zater's sole predicate conviction of §371 conspiracy can only categorically be considered a "crime of violence" through §924(c)'s now-void residual clause?

Whether the Fourth Circuit's denial of Zater's §2244 application, which would have been granted in other circuits under divergent gatekeeping protocols, creates exceptional circumstances warranting an exercise of the Supreme Court's supervisory powers, since Zater's sole predicate conviction of §371 conspiracy can only categorically be considered a 'crime of violence' through §924(c)'s now-void residual clause