No. 18-6682

Roberto Moreno Ramos v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2018-11-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Amici (1)IFP
Tags: collateral-review due-process due-process-rights habeas ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief state-procedures trial-ineffectiveness trial-rights
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When a State chooses to create a mechanism for post-conviction relief, what due process is required to afford a habeas applicant an adequate and effective opportunity to present a claim of trial ineffectiveness in his initial collateral review?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED When a State chooses to create a mechanism for post-conviction relief, what due process is required to afford a habeas applicant an adequate and effective opportunity to present a claim of trial ineffectiveness in his initial collateral review? Did the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals violate Mr. Moreno Ramos’s due process rights when in applied unfair and arbitrary procedures to deny him any opportunity for review of his substantial trial ineffectiveness claim? ii

Docket Entries

2018-11-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-14
Application (18A512) referred to the Court.
2018-11-14
Application (18A512) denied by the Court.
2018-11-14
Application (18A512) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Alito.
2018-11-14
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Retired Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Judges.
2018-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2018)
2018-11-14
Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed.
2018-11-14
Reply of Roberto M. Ramos filed.

Attorneys

Roberto Ramos
Danalynn RecerGulf Region Advocacy Center, Petitioner
Danalynn RecerGulf Region Advocacy Center, Petitioner
State of Texas
Tina J. MirandaTexas Attorney General, Respondent
Tina J. MirandaTexas Attorney General, Respondent