No. 18-6683
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process fair-trial fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-procedure jury jury-deliberation readback sixth-amendment witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant was denied his rights to a fair trial and to due process of law under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a defendant was denied his rights to a fair trial and to due process of law under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments when the trial court failed to respond to a request from the deliberating jury for readback of the testimony of three crucial witnesses, either by ordering the readback or by acknowledging that a request had been received and would be acted upon, thereby coercing — albeit inadvertently — the jury into reaching a verdict. 1
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-27
Waiver of right of respondent State of California to respond filed.
2018-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2018)
Attorneys
Cody McLaurin Sakoman
Hilda E. Scheib — Hilda Scheib, Esquire, Petitioner
Hilda E. Scheib — Hilda Scheib, Esquire, Petitioner
State of California
Rene Antonio Chacon — CA Deptartment of Justice, Respondent
Rene Antonio Chacon — CA Deptartment of Justice, Respondent