No. 18-6686
Grady Pederson v. Minnesota, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights double-jeopardy due-process evidence-suppression sex-offender-registry standing statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-01-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Why was the State of Minnesota allowed to suppress evidence since 11/01/1995?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-12
Waiver of right of respondents City of Fulda, City of Worthington, City of Windom and their respective Police Departments to respond filed.
2018-11-27
Waiver of right of respondents Cottonwood County Sheriff's Dept, Deputy LaCanne, Murray County Sheriff's Dept, Nobles County Sheriff's Dept to respond filed.
2018-07-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2018)
Attorneys
City of Fulda, City of Worthington, City of Windom and their respective Police Departments
Daniel P. Kutz — League of Minnesota Cities, Respondent
Cottonwood County Sheriff's Dept, Deputy LaCanne, Murray County Sheriff's Dept, Nobles County Sheriff's Dept
Jon K. Iverson — Iverson Reuvers, Respondent
Grady Pederson
Grady Pederson Jr. — Petitioner