Where petitioner was denied a fair trial due to the introduction of prior inconsistent statements

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) WHERE PETITIONER WAS DENIED A FAIR TRIAL WHERE THE STATE INTRODUCED EACH OF THREE KEY STATE WITNESSES PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS WHICH WERE UNNECESSARILY DUPLICATIVE OF EACH OTHER AMOUNTED TO INADMISSIBLE PRIOR CONSISTENT STATEMENTS? 2) WHERE PREJUDICIAL ERROR THE STATE TO CALL AS ITS FIRST WITNESS (VICTIM'S MOTHER) ? , 3) WHERE THE PETITIONER WAS DENIED A FAIR TRIAL BY INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL? 4) WHERE THE JURY QUESTION AS TO SECOND DEGREE MURDER INSTRUCTION? LIST OF. PARTIES [X] ALL’ PARTIES APPEAR IN THE CAPTION OF THE CASE ON THE COVER PAGE. [ ] ALL PARTIES DO NOT APPEAR IN THE CAPTION OF THE CVASE ON THE COVER PAGE. A LIST OF ALL