No. 18-6697
Kevin Marquette Bellinger v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-procedure due-process evidence federal-jurisdiction jury jury-instructions malice-aforethought mens-rea murder murder-conviction statutory-interpretation sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there was sufficient evidence presented to the jury in Bellinger's case to convict Bellinger of murder as alleged in Counts One and Two, where the Government failed to prove malice aforethought?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether there was sufficient evidence presented to the jury in Bellinger’s case to convict Bellinger of murder as alleged in Counts One and Two, where the Government failed to prove malice aforethought? 1
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2018)
Attorneys
Kevin Marquette Bellinger
Kristen Marie Leddy — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Kristen Marie Leddy — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent