Whether Mr. Zemke received ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; I. Mr. Zemke received ineffective assistance under the Sixth Amendment when counsel misrepresented Mr. Zemke’s case to induce a plea bargain, prejudiced Mr. Zemke by submitting a delayed and deficient motion to withdraw, and improperly asserted his opinion in court as to Mr. Zemke’s culpability. i. The Trial Court Abused Its Discretion Despite Counsel’s Ineffective Assistance When It Denied Mr. Zemke’s Plea Withdrawal Request Which Included an Assertion of Innocence and Was Made Before Sentencing. HH. The Trial Court Abused Its Discretion In Denying Defendant’s Plea Withdrawal Request Based On Inaccurate and Improperly Asserted Prejudice by. the Prosecution. IV. The Trial Court Abused Its Discretion and Displayed Bias and Prejudice When It Openly Agreed With The Prosecution’s Presentation Of The Case In Court. 2