No. 18-6706
Jeremiah Davis v. United States
IFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act constitutional-law criminal-law enhanced-penalties predicate-offense reckless-driving sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should a crime that can be committed by reckless driving resulting in injury be a predicate offense for the Armed Career Criminal Act and its significantly enhanced penalties?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Should a crime that can be committed by reckless driving resulting in injury be a predicate offense for the Armed Career Criminal Act and its significantly enhanced penalties? i
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-28
Reply of petitioner Jeremiah Davis filed.
2019-02-15
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-01-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 15, 2019.
2019-01-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 16, 2019 to February 15, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-12-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 16, 2019.
2018-12-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 17, 2018 to January 16, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 17, 2018)
Attorneys
Jeremiah Davis
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent