No. 18-672

City of Newport Beach, California, et al. v. Richard Vos, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (6)
Tags: ada-title-ii americans-with-disabilities-act fourth-amendment law-enforcement mental-illness totality-of-the-circumstances use-of-force
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA FourthAmendment DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-05-16 (distributed 6 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act require law enforcement officers to provide accommodations to an armed, violent, and mentally ill suspect in the course of bringing the suspect into custody?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act require law enforcement officers to provide accommodations to an armed, violent, and mentally ill suspect in the course of bringing the suspect into custody? (This Court granted certiorari on this question in City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan, Docket No. 13-1412, but did not resolve it.) 2. Under the Fourth Amendment “totality of the circumstances” analysis for assessing the reasonableness of force used against a suspect who attacks law enforcement officers, must a court take into account allegedly unreasonable police conduct that took place before the use of force, but foreseeably created the need to use that force? 3. Under the Fourth Amendment’s analysis for use of force, is alaw enforcement officer’s interest in using deadly force against a suspect threatening an officer’s life diminished if the assailant is mentally ill?

Docket Entries

2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-25
Reply of petitioners City of Newport Beach, a governmental entity; Richard Henry; Nathan Farris filed. (Distributed)
2019-03-11
Brief of respondents Richard Vos, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-01-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 11, 2019. See Rule 30.1.
2019-01-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 8, 2019 to March 10, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-01-09
Response Requested. (Due February 8, 2019)
2019-01-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
2018-12-20
Waiver of right of respondents Richard Vos, et al. to respond filed.
2018-12-20
Brief amici curiae of California State Association of Counties, et al. filed.
2018-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 24, 2018)

Attorneys

California State Association of Counties, et al.
Lee Harris RoistacherDaley & Heft, LLP, Amicus
Lee Harris RoistacherDaley & Heft, LLP, Amicus
City of Newport Beach, a governmental entity; Richard Henry; Nathan Farris
Daniel P. BarerPollak, Vida and Barer, Petitioner
Daniel P. BarerPollak, Vida and Barer, Petitioner
Richard Vos, et al.
Paul Lindsey HoffmanSchonbrun Seplow Harris & Hoffman LLP, Respondent
Paul Lindsey HoffmanSchonbrun Seplow Harris & Hoffman LLP, Respondent