Gavin Cullens v. Cindi Curtin, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Did the trial court err when it gave out self-defense instruction for complainants who were not accused of any crimes to warrant a defense? Alternatively, was the trial counsel ineffective in failing to object which violated the accused's due-process-rights?
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR WHEN IT GAVE OUT SELF DEFENSE INSTRUCTION FOR COMPLAINANTS WHO WERE NOT ACCUSED GF ANY CRIMES TO WARRANT A DEFENSE? ALTERNATIVELY WAS THE TRIAL COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE IN FAILING TO OBJECT WHICH VIOLATED THE ACCUSE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS? PETITIONER CULLENS ANSWER YES KENTUCKY SUPREME COURT (SONES VS COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY 366 S.ul.3d 376; 2011 KY LEXIS 133) --ANSWER --"YES" STATE OF MICHIGAN ANSWER *NO" U.S OLSTRICT COURT OF EASTERN MICH ( NOS 2-13-C-V-11835, 2016 WL 5476247 ~-ANSWER--~ "NOM U.S COURT OF APPEALS (6TH CIR) (NO# 16-2512) --ANSWERS-~ "NOM