Was the evidence sufficient to sustain Mr. Ozier's conviction for armed robbery and bank robbery?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AT TRIAL WAS INSUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN MR. OZIER'S CONVICTION FOR ARMED ROBBERY AND BANK ROBBERY. II. PETITIONER WAS DENIED HIS RIGHT TO CONFRONTATION WHEN TRIAL ATTORNEY COULD_NOT_CROSS-— cree EXAMINE HIS PAROLE AGENT ABOUT HER MOTIVES, : PREJUDICE OR BIAS SHE MAY HARBOR IN .IDENTI; Fo ee FYING -HIM o-——n e III. PETITIONER'S SIXTH AMENDMENT TO CONFRON-. TATION WAS VIOLATED WHEN HE WAS DENIED THE OPPORTUNITY TO CROSS-EXAMINE THE IN. 4. 4... ..FROMANT AND DETECTIVE STILES WHO-ACCUSED..— oe HIM OF BANK ROBBERY, COUNSEL WAS INEF~~ me FECTIVE FOR FAILING TO OBJECT. PETITIONER WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL WHEN COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO INVESTIGATE AND CALLING TO TRIAL A EYEWITNESS. Vv. PETITIONER WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE FO TRIAL COUNSEL WHEN TRIAL COUNSEL FAILED TO CHALLENGE PETITIONER'S ARREST WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE, CREATING A RADICAL DEFECT RENDERING THE PROCEEDING VOID AND APPELLATE COUNSEL FOR FAILING TO RAISE ISSUE ON DIRECT ABA