No. 18-6737
Jose Lopez-Castillo v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: booker booker-decision constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-sentencing federal-sentencing-guidelines judicial-discretion mandatory-minimum mandatory-minimums sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent title-21
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the mandatory-sentencing regime of Title 21 has been abrogated by United States v. Booker and its progeny
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented for Review I. Whether the regime of Title 21 has been abrogated by United States v. Booker and its progeny. --prefix-
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2018)
Attorneys
Jose Lopez-Castillo
John C. Lemon — Law Offices of John C. Lemon, APC, Petitioner
John C. Lemon — Law Offices of John C. Lemon, APC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent