No. 18-6746
Joseph Haymore, et al. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure judicial-precedent severance severance-motion waiver waiver-rule
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether failure to renew a severance motion at the close of evidence waives the issue, such that it precludes appellate review
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether failure to renew a severance motion at the close of evidence waives the issue, such that it precludes appellate review. Only the Ninth Circuit applies a wholesale waiver rule, which conflicts with the other courts of appeals, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b), and this Court’s precedent. --prefix-
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 21, 2018)
Attorneys
Joseph Haymore, et al.
Timothy Allen Scott — Scott Trial Lawyers, APC, Petitioner
Timothy Allen Scott — Scott Trial Lawyers, APC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent