No. 18-6748
Malachi M. Glass v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: controlled-substance controlled-substance-offense criminal-law criminal-statute drug-offense federal-law federal-sentencing pennsylvania pennsylvania-law sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the broader Pennsylvania delivery of a controlled substance statute, 35 Pa. C.S.A. § 780-113(a)(30), qualifies as a 'controlled-substance-offense' under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE BROADER PENNSYLVANIA DELIVERY OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE STATUTE, 35 PA. C.S.A. § 780-113(A)(30), QUALIFIES AS A “CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENSE” UNDER U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b)? ii
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 21, 2018)
Attorneys
Malachi Glass
Edward J. Rymsza III — Miele & Rymsza, P.C., Petitioner
Edward J. Rymsza III — Miele & Rymsza, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent