Whether the restitution award in child pornography sentencings must disaggregate the harm caused by the initial abuse from the harm caused by the possession and continued dissemination of the images when the defendant was not involved in the initial abuse?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Whether the restitution award in child pornography sentencings must disaggregate the harm caused by the initial abuse from the harm caused by the possession and continued dissemination of the images when the defendant was not involved in the initial abuse? (2) Whether special conditions of supervised release that ban viewing or possessing pornographic and erotic materials are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad? ii