No. 18-6764
Kenneth Ray Borders v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-defendant criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel interlocutory-appeal presumption-of-prejudice roe-v-flores-ortega sixth-amendment trial-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the 'presumption of prejudice' recognized in Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470 (2000), apply where a criminal defendant instructs his trial counsel to file an interlocutory appeal and trial counsel fails to do so?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the “presumption of prejudice” recognized in Roe v. FloresOrtega, 528 U.S. 470 (2000), apply where a criminal defendant instructs his trial counsel to file an interlocutory appeal and trial counsel fails to do so? i
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 20, 2018)
Attorneys
Kenneth Ray Borders
Robert David Malove — The Law Office of Robert David Malove, PA, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent