No. 18-6774
Jimmy L. Thompson v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge criminal-law criminal-sentencing due-process felon-in-possession firearm-charges predicate-felony sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation void-ab-initio void-statute
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a conviction based on a void statute can be used to increase punishment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a conviction based on a statute that has been held void ab initio can be used to increase punishment as a predicate felony pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §922(g), charging felon in possession of a firearm. ii
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-03-21
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-02-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 21, 2019.
2019-02-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 19, 2019 to March 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-01-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 19, 2019.
2019-01-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 17, 2019 to February 19, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-12-18
Response Requested. (Due January 17, 2019)
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 21, 2018)
Attorneys
Jimmy Thompson
Susan Michele Pavlow — Law Offices of Susan M. Pavlow, Petitioner
Susan Michele Pavlow — Law Offices of Susan M. Pavlow, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent