Whether the Huckleberry Homeowners Association and its individual members denied Joan Farr her rights under 42 USC 1983 and retaliated against her to deny her freedom of speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution

Questions Presented For Review 1. Whether the Huckleberry Homeowners Association and its individual members denied Joan Farr her rights under 42 USC 1983 and retaliated against her to deny her freedom of speech under'the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. ‘2. Whether Joan Farr was denied due process of law under the Fifth Amendment, the right to an attorney under the Sixth Amendment, the right to a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, since the courts knew she had not been able to acquire legal representation for 18 years. 3. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in its decision after Joan Farr showed sufficient circumstantial evidence to prove a nexus for conspiracy by the defendants to deny her rights. 4. Whether Amendment XXVIII should be added to the U.S. Constitution which gives everyone the right to be represented in a civil matter the same as a criminal one, or should the words “and justice for a//’ be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance.