No. 18-6792
Christopher W. Fillmore v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-court circuit-split civil-procedure cross-motions district-court equitable-remedies evidence evidence-sufficiency evidentiary-insufficiency judicial-discretion representation-resources summary-judgment
Key Terms:
ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court and Seventh Circuit erred in granting summary judgment for Indiana Bell despite finding that both parties submitted 'sparse' or insufficient evidence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2019-02-28
Case considered closed.
2019-01-07
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until January 28, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-27
Waiver of right of respondent Indiana Bell Telephone to respond filed.
2018-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 24, 2018)
Attorneys
Indiana Bell Telephone
Laura Lindner — Littler Mendelson, P.C., Respondent
Laura Lindner — Littler Mendelson, P.C., Respondent