No. 18-6795

Darrell Brown v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-court-procedure civil-procedure due-process great-writ habeas-corpus habeas-corpus-review judicial-precedent judicial-proceedings remand section-2255 standing supervisory-power supreme-court-precedent supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari in this case

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . -1. Whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari in this case whereas:the petition creates an important first impression of the merits, which will have an effect on the outcome of these proceedings. Specfically, Petitioner was .. denied the protections of the Great Writ in its entirety by the lower court's failure to adjudicate all of his claims presented in his initial § 2255 motion ? 2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, by failing to remand: Petitioner's case in light of establ shed Supreme Court precedent Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 (1982), and Eleventh Circuit precedent in Clisby v. Jones, 960 F.2d 925 .. (11th Cir.. 1992), as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power ?

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 24, 2018)

Attorneys

Darrell Brown
Darrell Brown — Petitioner
Darrell Brown — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent