Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Does a defendant preserve a confrontation issue for review by clearly articulating Confrontation Clause concerns as the basis for his objection without specifically mentioning the Confrontation Clause?
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Does a defendant preserve a confrontation issue for review by clearly articulating Confrontation Clause concerns as the basis for his objection without specifically mentioning the Confrontation Clause? i NO. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2018 SHANE ROACH, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. DECLARATION OF COUNSEL Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.2, I, Aric G. Elsenheimer, Assistant Federal Public Defender for the District of New Mexico, declare under penalty of perjury that I am a member of the bar of this court and counsel for Petitioner Shane Roach and that I caused to be mailed a copy of the petition for writ of certiorari to this court by first class mail, postage prepaid by depositing the original and ten copies in an envelope addressed to the Clerk of this Court, in the United States Post Office at 1135 Broadway Blvd. NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico, at approximately p.m. on the 19" day of November 2018. Aric G. Elsenheimer Attorney for Petitioner FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER 111 Lomas NW, Suite 501 Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 346-2489 ii