No. 18-6809

Desmond Camp v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-924c categorical-analysis constitutional-vagueness crime-of-violence criminal-law hobbs-act Hobbs-Act-robbery physical-violence residual-clause sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation vagueness
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

May Hobbs Act robbery serve as a crime of violence for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. May Hobbs Act robbery serve as a crime of violence for purposes of 18 U.S.C.§ 924(c) when Hobbs Act robbery does not match the elements clause of Section 924(c) because it does not require violent physical force and the substantial risk clause of Section 924(c) does not apply because it is unconstitutionally vague? ii

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2018)

Attorneys

Desmond Camp
Kenneth TablemanKenneth P. Tableman, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent