Whether the officer's actions in refusing to allow the petitioners to view the video recording of the incident and denying their request for legal counsel violated their constitutional rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED » We ast our lait tb fee wy the. officer Say we told 2 cer Somethin dnt Sau and 4 Lor . re i cgi ng Sane tte cae Dye. Bee Could They pull the vadeo we the ofheer miter came do thie \rse te She he Convecsoh oy xe Fook 2) We BK Pabncen Goole 3 lawyers Be Gresend she hed Wher Licemre toey refyse . Sometiring he wasnt et KX hear or wetness Anol My law Wer ape ask oicer Seopel th 5) We also ask how Corld Yrey ged mm Mom PMV recote/ Woes, unless Then ently (sek oF Tasha Geald PMV recerd amd Sad Heiss Peebncea Geeld read CoNse MW Spawdld Sha always had her license Gwe ask pre. dvdl§e. in the Ctnt Cant do ve ~Ye pow Cece foe Patrice COS She HSE te Hre hens Chorexe wh peu ane! Scio! (CorI5e WE did het Mike Ae (0 yy in” aul | 5) ofBeoy Scopeleth teshdy Ve Creer Court that nen her \awuer . . Ce L Aechi§ In He. Covet Cr thee She Spake ard i he fehy antl Awd note ho: se a testby he (Uneartey