Whether the court's instructions to the jury violated the Separation of Powers doctrine

Questions Presented violate the Sepapattay of Powels onel dead Petitiunen atria | by Jury by Omni ting From te dury astructans Hire Steitettery test ee wOHen at (Lor Loe a hobloy" in (fC USC Faj@eiye) ("\ leght of the odmenish ment ta United Stedes v. Henan SIF Fadl 92 , Hth Ow Cect Denied 1415 thet 1+ LO 90 Necessary bw Lhe Jury tu be instructed te dis Ting uitsh betwee, q peek. ond 4a busines pyar Petthanat obrecron 3 | @ +. ik @ violation of Retitiupers Dh tun and Siycth Cunee duct pants | -lo deny a Pro Se A gent! Cel S$ ty law resources” Zz A Must aN Cost ord t On explanation to enlince o defendeuts Sentenle oy Simply statiig, te taliemehe tube hod We roakicered dye LG USC | 2663 (a) fa ctor’ eno mater Naw Queshins Preseated he Culed } | Csr? Hoe abyechans of & a is tte sentence Unpecsonable and Uidlek tHe tn ond Codd, amend mente because Hey, allow facts +e pe foun! by qQ Qudge instead oto Fury 2 | (D ‘Does it Jrolaly tHe 4) f {Uy onl Guth “cumendhrierts ty allaa a Judge to enhante & Seatenc? Using obetruchen OLD ustic-e” enheond emer DECaUse Q Cpse tN & Zee. UUs Meaninret wthad opplanatton ca gp Te wie negative Under A2UlaKs) is Me clement of knawbalge rp equtiect to we at the kvme ane Sale as ieee } United Stedes uy. Fetes and a, 5 1 esha ihah the Cat A Npasis we lbed plain ener tei