Was the Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment and Title VII civil rights compromised or violated?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , Was the Plaintiff, under The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the Constitution, and The Fair Employment and Housing Act and The Civil Rights Act Title VII compromise or violated? Did the Panel’s Decision Conflicts with Prior Decisions of this Court and Binding Precedent of the Supreme Court? Constitutional right (Fourteen Amendment) and Title VII Civil rights? Was the United States Court of Appeals decision in conflict with the Decision of appeal on this important matter; and decided an important Federal Question which in a way that conflicts with a decision by a State Court? Did the State court depart from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings such a departure by a lower ; court. As to call for an exercise of the Supreme Court supervisory power? Did the state court or a United States court of Appeals decide an important question of Federal Law that has not been, but should be settled by the Supreme Court or has decided an important federal question in a way that conflict with relevant decisions of the Supreme Court? . Did the Respondent(s) Legal Counsel rush to Dismiss Plaintiff case with Prejudice; with regards to counting 90 Calendar days including weekend(s) Holidays instead 90 working calendar days? Did the Court dismissal of Plaintiff's case against County of Los Angeles, ET’AL granted on Motion Dismissal on 02/20/2018, stated that Plaintiff did not serve the Respondents with the Petition and Summons, which was mailed on 11/30/2018 in the allocated amount of time 90 days working days, should the case be Dismiss? ~ Did the Respondent(s) Legal Counsel filed a Motion to Dismiss that plaintiff did filed the Petition within the allotted time of 90 calendar days and holidays were counted, instead of Working days which add up to 69 days, not 90 Calendar days as alleged by Legal Counsel for the Respondent(s)? : Was the Plaintiff disparate impacted? Was the disparate treatment an intentional decision to treat people differently based on their race or other protected characteristics in United States Labor Law question? Did the Respondent(s) Legal Counsel purposely forward the Motion to Dismiss, which was filed on 12/2 1/2017 and Granted 2/20/2018, the Motion to Dismiss was never serve or rec’d by the plaintiff; due to incorrect address which cause a Prejudice outcome of the Plaintiff Petition? 8