No. 18-6828
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment sufficiency-of-evidence trial-counsel
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (from Petition)
Was the evidence sufficient to sustain Petitioner's convictions, and was Petitioner denied his Sixth Amendment Right under the United States Constitution to the effective assistance of counsel where his trial counsel failed to preserve the sufficiiency issue for appellate review?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the evidence sufficient to sustain Petitioner's convictions, and was Petitioner denied his Sixth Amendment Right under the United States Constitution to the effective assistance of counsel where his trial counsel failed to preserve the sufficiency issue for appellate review?
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-18
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2018-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 27, 2018)
Attorneys
Gregg Thomas
Gregg Thomas — Petitioner
Maryland
Carrie J. Williams — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent