Does the State meet its burdens of showing that it clearly informed a criminal defendant of his Miranda rights and that a defendant validly waived them?

Question Presented Does the State meet its burdens of showing that it clearly informed a criminal defendant of his Miranda rights and that a defendant validly waived them when the interrogating officer never uses the words “remain silent,” never gets an affirmation that defendant understood that anything he said could be used against him in court, and the transcript of the interrogation is replete with non sequiturs, silence, and express declarations by defendant that he did not understand the advisements?