Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions

No question identified. : | fd O OF AL WIH CL FRAVIFY PYYM SYTM AYLIYY GRY WD Full -TOW SIAYTTHIY SALDY SHS EINVIVHMAY PWY QL CRAY FH NOH POWIBATN) PISNND UYITIMIW SYM (S) Lo bg HPLYLS HLTH WWININ SIH OL INVATTY DW IMEY LITYIT NO STTINYT HLS! SSANLIM SINANNYIOD FHL IP NOLYNIWYXD -SSOVI LIWYTE GL TINA LI NAAM O290F LYOCZ FUL YAIMTHM QW SY SSS PHL FSIVY A PUVA FH NUM FONTPHIN TISNPT] AVTIIAV SY (4) ZNUGN GH-EC 7A OH NI 27 YOA LES YOYAE PSHIVLS QL @UVL 11 NIT NOUIVISIG SLI GISNGY LUITD WIL FHL YILFRO QL SY HISS) WL ISIVY QL CPW FH NHC FOUL] 1IHOTI YYTTUY SYM (SD ZNOLOW OIL -€C TYNINYO SN WNW? Y9I4 WER? youd — PMIWLS QL GINYS LI NIHOW NOULIVINT SLI CISNIY AYPO? TT TW YPHLTHM PL SY FSS) FZ FISIVY QL. CVA M NIM AULIIATIN| VISNCTI UVTTAAY SYM (€) J INV? FAL WIWWT? QL V7Y SNAIW ALISIMOTY FHL CIMT FH ISNVAT FNCU MING? CHIN FHUM LICUSSY TUYWYITY SINT Add V PALYCTTYANT MYT DUT MIN SSOT CU) d3LNAS3ud (S)NOLLSAND