No. 18-6847

Sergio Antonio Haro v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: effective-assistance-of-counsel evidentiary-hearing government-agent-reports impeachment impeachment-of-credibility magistrate-judge magistrate-judge-plea-negotiations plea-negotiations prejudice pro-se pro-se-habeas sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I Was the petitioner denied his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel based on trial counsel's failure to effectively use government agent reports to impeach their credibility, including whether the district court erred by denying this claim without first affording him, as a pro se habeas the opportunity to obtain those reports, which had been withheld from petitioner based upon a pretrial disclosure agreement. I Did the district court err in not conducting an evidentiary hearing on claim that the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case impermissibly participated in plea negotiations, which, in turn, prejudiced the ;

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2018)

Attorneys

Sergio Haro
Kathleen Genevieve WilliamsonWilliamson & Young, P.C., Petitioner
Kathleen Genevieve WilliamsonWilliamson & Young, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent