No. 18-6857
Joel Marvin Munt v. Paul Schnell, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review civil-procedure collateral-appeal district-court due-process judge judicial-jurisdiction judicial-recusal jurisdiction nondiscretionary-standard recusal standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Court of Appeals have jurisdiction to hear a collateral appeal of a district court judge's refusal of a nondiscretionary recusal?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Does the Court of Appeals have jurisdiction to hear a : collateral appeal of a district court judge’s refusal of a nondiscretionary recusal?
Docket Entries
2019-04-24
Case considered closed.
2019-02-19
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 12, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2019-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-12-13
Waiver of right of respondents Tom Roy, et al. to respond filed.
2018-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2018)
Attorneys
Joel M. Munt
Joel M. Munt — Petitioner
Paul Schnell, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Corrections, et al.
Tom Roy, et al.
Lindsay LaVoie — Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Respondent