No. 18-6862
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure johnson-standard johnson-v-united-states plain-error standard-of-review time-of-appeal time-of-law unsettled-law
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment
FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When the governing law is unsettled at the time of trial but settled-in defendant's favor by the time of appeals, should an appellate court reviewing for plain error apply the time-of-appeal standard of Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461 (1997)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; (1) When the governing law is unsettled at the time of trial but settled-in defendant's favor by the time of appeals. See: Carpenter v. United States, 137 S.Ct. 2211. Should an : appellate court reviewing for plain error apply the timeof-appeal standard of Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461 (1997); also see: Henderson v. United States, 568 U.S. 266, 272 (2013); q + v ‘ a o " ia
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2018)
Attorneys
John Thomas
John Thomas — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent