No. 18-6875
Kendall Thrift v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: affidavit circuit-conflict circuit-split criminal-procedure evidentiary-hearing false-statements franks-hearing franks-v-maryland magistrate-judge ninth-circuit omissions search-and-seizure substantial-showing warrant-challenge
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should grant certiorari because the Ninth Circuit's decision that defendant Kendall Thrift had not made a substantial preliminary showing to warrant a Franks v. Maryland evidentiary hearing ignores the record and conflicts with other circuit decisions
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Court should grant certiorari because the Ninth Circuit’s decision that defendant Kendall Thrift had not made a substantial preliminary showing to warrant a Franks v. Maryland evidentiary hearing ignores the record and conflicts with other circuit decisions. |
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 31, 2018)
Attorneys
Kendall Thrift
John Paul Balazs — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent