No. 18-6878
Shomari Salim Daley v. Maryland, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Why Flavors ed Beon gisen Me Hugh fo a. Farr, Spesdly and) Tevey Total) en Ynis Cote 277
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Why Flavors ed Beon gisen Me Hugh fo a. Farr, Spesdly and) Tevey Total) en Ynis Cote 277 2) Why dd) amd Do All The Secgen chease to Shows DAF oF have tha Reale fo Ropranont huptallf aoe Uy dlocant the STATE of Marland) Respact my Rights and Atcorodate fo ME Under tho Ammueane Sth Dineholtirs Ack 22? Kibodiy, Sestiee and the Rowuct of fopinen £2 J Ths. Sudlisa) Spftion to Diatroys® rj Sorat and) hy wre tl Toes My KE EVEN Masten to You PE ope 277 Dl 0 There Sustie. Bor Abl cohen Dann on constant FEAR Sox Ney LiFe 270
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-02-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent State of Maryland to respond filed.
2018-11-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 31, 2018)
Attorneys
State of Maryland
Adam D. Snyder — Civil Division, Respondent
Adam D. Snyder — Civil Division, Respondent