No. 18-6879
Darren Hogue v. Brad Cain, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-court-decision due-process federal-courts federal-habeas-corpus habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining plea-colloquy sixth-amendment standard-of-review waiver-hearing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit's memorandum decision contravene this Court's command that a proper review of a viable Sixth Amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel requires review of evidence outside a standard plea colloquy and waiver hearing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Ninth Circuit’s memorandum decision contravene this Court’s command that a proper review of a viable Sixth Amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel requires review of evidence outside a standard plea colloquy and waiver hearing? i
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent Mark Nooth to respond filed.
2018-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 31, 2018)
Attorneys
Darren Hogue
Mark Nooth
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent