No. 18-688

Mark Mann v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 26-usc-5861 atf federal-firearms-dealer federal-licensing firearm-transfer gun-store huddleston-v-united-states nfa-firearms possession registration repair service-evaluation tax-registration transfer
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d) require a federally licensed firearms dealer to register a weapon in his name for tax purposes if he took possession of the customer's weapon for service and evaluation in his public gun store?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Chapter 9 of the transfers of NFA Firearms Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Section 9.5.1 Repair of Firearms states: ATF does not consider the temporary conveyance of an NFA firearm to an FFL for repair to be a transfer under the NFA. Thus, a transfer application is not required to convey the firearm for repair or to return the repaired firearm to its owner/possessor. Nevertheless, in order to avoid any appearance that a transfer has taken place, ATF recommends that a Form 5 application be submitted for approval prior to conveying the firearm for repair. If Form 5 is not used to convey a firearm for repair or return the repaired firearm to the owner, the parties should maintain documentation showing that the conveyance was for the purpose of repair, identifying the firearm, and showing the anticipated time for repair. Approved Form 5, or the recommended documentation, will show that an unlawful transfer did not take place and that the FFL making the repairs is not in unlawful possession of the firearm. In light of Chapter 9 of the transfers of NFA Firearms Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco section 9.5.1 Repair of firearms: 1. Does 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d) require a federally licensed firearms dealer to register a weapon in his name for tax purposes if he took possession of the customer’s weapon for service and evaluation in his public gun store? li QUESTIONS PRESENTED — Continued 2. In light of Huddleston v. United States, 415 U.S. 814, 824 (1974), is a federally licensed firearms dealer a federal agent in the eyes of 26 U.S.C. § 5681(d)? 3. Is an entrapment estoppel defense burden of proof at trial on the defendant?

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2018)

Attorneys

Mark Mann
Mark Mann — Petitioner
Mark Mann — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent