No. 18-69
Yan Ping Xu v. City of New York, New York, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights due-process employee-retaliation equal-protection federal-defendants federal-jurisdiction legal-remedy municipal-authority municipal-liability retaliation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment FifthAmendment EmploymentDiscrimina
DueProcess FirstAmendment FifthAmendment EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether no remedy for the former municipal employee injured directly from her supervisors, federal defendants clothed with municipal authority power, is equal justice under law
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether no remedy for the former municipal : ; employee injured directly from her supervisors, federal defendants clothed with municipal authority power, is equal justice under law. ' 2. Whether the dismissal of the retaliation claim : against all defendants was properly affirmed.
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES to respond filed.
2018-07-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 13, 2018)
2018-03-27
Application (17A1039) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until July 9, 2018.
2018-03-20
Application (17A1039) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 8, 2018 to July 7, 2018, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Attorneys
UNITED STATES
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent