No. 18-6916
Troy Lincoln Powell v. California
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-sentencing death-penalty due-process eighth-amendment fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment mental-illness sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the imposition of the death penalty on a severely mentally ill defendant violate the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1) DOES THE IMPOSITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY ON A SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL DEFENDANT VIOLATE THE FIFTH, SIXTH, EIGHTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS?
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-01-31
Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.
2018-12-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 4, 2019.
2018-12-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 3, 2019 to February 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-11-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2019)
Attorneys
California
Pamela Chiyoko Hamanaka — Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Pamela Chiyoko Hamanaka — Attorney General's Office, Respondent