No. 18-6920

Clyde Retiz v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction indictment plea-bargaining reasonable-sentence sentencing sentencing-factors sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether facts that alter the range of 'reasonable' federal sentences must be pleaded in the indictment in federal cases?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether facts that alter the range of “reasonable” federal sentences must be pleaded in the indictment in federal cases? ii PARTIES Clyde Retiz, is the petitioner, who was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the respondent, who was the plaintiff-appellee below. ili

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 7, 2019)

Attorneys

Clyde Retiz
Kevin Joel PageOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel PageOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent