No. 18-6938
Jarrod Phillips v. Rusty Washburn, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-procedure boykin-precedent boykin-v-alabama civil-rights constitutional-review constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process eighth-amendment excessive-fines fourteenth-amendment incorporation ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement plea-bargaining strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the lower courts denial is contrary to this Honorable Supreme Court's holding in Boykin v. Alabama in the Plea matter. IL. Whether the lower courts denial is contrary to this Honorable Supreme Court's holding in Strickland v. Washington in the Ineffective Assistance of Counsel matter. UI. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in denying Petitioner's appeal. -2
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent Washburn, Warden to respond filed.
2018-11-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Washburn, Warden
John Henry Bledsoe III — Office of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent
John Henry Bledsoe III — Office of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent