No. 18-6944

Jose Luis Vizcaino-Ramos v. Cherry Lindamood, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-12-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process exhaustion-doctrine exhaustion-of-state-remedies habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel martinez-rule martinez-v-ryan procedural-default tennessee tennessee-post-conviction-procedures trial-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether under Martinez v. Ryan, a prisoner confined pursuant to a Tennessee Judgment may assert ineffective assistance of initial-collateral-review counsel as cause to excuse the procedural default of a substantial claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether under Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S.Ct. 1309 (2012), a ‘ prisoner confined pursuant to a Tennessee Judgment may assert ineffective assistance of counsel as cause to excuse the procedural default of a substantial claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel when Tennessee's . procedural rules consider the _ complete only upon exhausting the IATC claims through the TCCA and and initial-collateral counsel failed to properly exhaust this substantive [ATC claim? ii

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent Lindamood, Warden to respond filed.
2018-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 7, 2019)

Attorneys

Jose Luis Vizcaino-Ramos
Jose Luis Vizcaino-Ramos — Petitioner
Jose Luis Vizcaino-Ramos — Petitioner
Lindamood, Warden
John Henry Bledsoe IIIOffice of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent
John Henry Bledsoe IIIOffice of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent